|
The dynamics
of human inter-personal relationships may have made for some of the
most memorable and enduring of cinema’s treasures but there is one
aspect of human social interaction which has provoked filmmakers into
some of their most emotionally affecting and personally revealing work:
sexual socialization. As environmental factors impacting
sexual maturation have a conditioning affect in addition to biological
drives, the cinema of inter-personal development seeks to dramatize the
dualism in what Romantic poet William Blake expressed so eloquently as
the transition from innocence to experience.
In Sergio Leone’s violent, epic gangster saga Once Upon a Time in America,
for instance, a teenage boy has bought a small dessert treat not for
himself but to give to a girl in exchange for his first sexual
experience. However, this boy is left alone for some time
waiting and his eyes are torn between the door the girl is behind and
the dessert treat he holds in his hands: divided between the
temptations of a boy and a man. There is an innocence in his
dilemma, but it is the incipient yearning for experience that gives it
added poignancy. Yet, in that lure of sexual curiosity can be
a perversity that makes innocence sinister: hence the boy in The Sailor Who Fell from Grace
with the Sea who has drilled a hole in the wall in order to spy on his
mother’s bedroom activities.
But, just as the Oedipal affect of familial circumstances on sexual
development is stressed in film so is the sense of deterministic
socialization. Hence, Pretty
Baby examined the life of a teenage girl (Brooke Shields)
whose childhood is spent in a New Orleans brothel where she lives with
her whore mother (Susan Sarandon). Inevitably, her sense of
adult womanhood is heavily socialized in terms of this home
environment: her rite of passage into adulthood being her first client
and the loss of her virginity for money an act she accepts as a natural
given of the world she inhabits: social determinism denying her an
individualized self-actualization. Often it is similarly
ambiguous and qualified conceptions of childhood socialization into
experience rather than celebrations of innocence which are the dominant
concerns in adult-oriented films about the maturation process, from the
boy shouting for his idolized hero to return at the end of Shane to the
conscious deliberation of the child to remain forever innocent in The Tin Drum.
For contrast, it is interesting to note the distinction between
depictions of childhood in films made for adults and films made for
children / families. In the latter, typified by what has come
to be known as the Disney ethic, childhood innocence is
idealized. Although the main message behind these films may
be positive, similar portrayals in adult-oriented films are cautious
and even negative regarding innocence – here, childhood innocence is an
illusion held in contrast to the sheer monstrousness of the adult world
which must inevitably consume it to the point where in, say, River’s Edge,
teenagers have been so amorally warped by their socialization that they
think nothing when one of them kills a friend: the complex and morally
ambiguous state of “experience” consumes whatever pure “innocence” may
have existed to begin with – “experience” is the inescapable reality to
which all are socialized.
No consideration of themes of childhood innocence in modern populist
cinema would be complete without mention of Steven Spielberg.
The hit family film E.T
the Extra-Terrestrial idealizes innocence to the point
where children have the last vestige of humanism, protecting a
benevolent alien from the adult inhumanity that would see it
dissected. Yet, as an adult, Spielberg is aware of the
escapism inherent in his conception of innocence, so much so that, some
twenty years later, the robot child in A.I. Artificial Intelligence
is programmed with an unconditional love for his mother, indicative of
what the film considers innocence, but which is revealed finally to be
a perfect but virtually delusional state. The progression in
Spielberg is striking for the director’s reluctance to fully relinquish
the conception of an absolute innocence even in the face of cynical
despair. However, A.I as a project was initiated by the
cynical Stanley (Eyes
Wide Shut) Kubrick and only inhered by Spielberg at a
later date.
The vast discrepancy evident between so-called safe family fare and
more adult considerations reveals that what is commonly considered
“innocence” is actually a multi-faceted deliberate construct rather
than a true state of being: an interpretation of childhood.
However, the alternative “experience” with its fatalistic inevitability
is often so unrelentingly despairing as to make a return to a
fabricated innocence a desired state, hence both the consistently
popular nature of innocuous family entertainment and its ultimate
thematic insignificance to an adult audience: insignificant because it
negates the qualities which distinguish the dramatization of the
maturation process and its symbolic transition from innocence to
experience in true adult-oriented cinema – ambiguity and
irony. ###
A Relationship Movie Made for Vindication
(an extract from Robert Cettl’s book Film Tales: Movie Trivia in the
Age of DVD)
At this
point in her career, in the midst of the Vietnam War, actress Jane
Fonda had appeared in a photograph in Newsweek, sitting on an enemy
anti-aircraft gun under the headline “Hanoi Jane”. The
moniker stuck and would dog her as she started to re-establish her
career in Hollywood. Her public position on Vietnam made her
a much despised figure and crippled her career in the mid
1970s. She could not find work, for fear of theatre owners
facing political demonstrations at a film she might be in.
Irony came to bear quite strongly thus when she was offered the role in
a romance involving a disabled Vietnam veteran, Coming Home, directed
by another outspoken critic of the Vietnam War, Hal Ashby.
The film was considered anti-American but was also one of the first
films to explore the romantic and sexual life of disabled
people. An unusual relationship picture it was also accepted
into the Cannes Film festival where it drew rave reviews for its
performances. Indeed, come time of the Academy Awards, both
Fonda and co-star Jon Voight won Oscars, Fonda considering hers a
private political vindication of her efforts to raise public
consciousness about the War and about the need for political activism.
|

Wider
Screenings columnist Robert
Cettl
has a B.A (Hons) in Film Study from the Flinders University of South
Australia, which included an international scholarship to the
University of Southern Illinois in the USA. He has
post-graduate
qualifications in Librarianship and Information Management from
UniSA. In addition to popular DVD reviewing, his writing for
McFarland (one of the leading American publishers of film non-fiction)
has been collected by such as Yale University Library and the British
Film Institute. His forthcoming work for this market (for
release
in 2010) is Terrorism
in American Cinema: a comprehensive analysis of terrorism
as a genre from fears of PLO inspired homeland attacks in Black Sunday to the
outright denouncement of the Bush War on Terror in W. His
previous work includes the above extracted Film Tales, now on
sale and coming soon as an ebook through Inkstone Digital and Amazon
Kindle in association with No
Limits.
For analysis and commentary on individual films mentioned in this
column (and hundreds of others) and for updates on the latest Hollywood
hits and choicest DVD releases, Wider
Screenings
is now on Twitter. Any @ reply will be duly answered – there
are
no automated DMs or tweets. If tweeting, please mention film
title in tweet: requests for films/DVDs to be reviewed are welcomed and
given priority. Free print copies of Film Tales can be
won in the tweet ‘n win Film Buff Quiz. First tweet request
being incorporated into Wider
Screenings is a retrospective of actor Warren Oates
beginning with the film Cockfighter,
a seldom seen look at cockfighting in the Southern States and a film
still banned in England.
 |